Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Am J Public Health ; 112(S3): S292-S297, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2054645

ABSTRACT

Recent national initiatives in nursing and public health have emphasized the need for a robust public health nursing (PHN) workforce. In this article, we analyze the extent to which recent national enumeration surveys base their counts of this workforce on the definitions, scope, and standards for practice and practice competencies of the PHN nursing specialty. By and large, enumeration surveys continue to rely on practice setting to define the PHN workforce, which is an insufficient approach for meeting the goals of major nursing and public health initiatives. We make recommendations for the development of new standards for PHN enumeration to strengthen the broader public health infrastructure and evaluate PHN contributions to population-level outcomes. (Am J Public Health. 2022;112(S3):S292-S297. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.306782).


Subject(s)
Nurses, Public Health , Humans , Public Health Nursing , United States
2.
Public Health Nurs ; 39(3): 677-682, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1546405

ABSTRACT

Public health nurses (PHNs) serve as the first line of prevention in public health and safety threats such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Although PHNs provide vital services to protect communities and populations' health, a pervasive lack of knowledge exists regarding the PHN role among policymakers and the general public. Advocacy for investment in the public health nursing workforce remains a priority as staffing and financial constraints have created sizeable barriers for PHNs during the COVID-19 response. Creating an advocacy video with personal stories from PHNs emerges as a powerful and cost-effective strategy to increase the visibility of PHNs. For this project, interviews with PHNs from COVID-19 hot spots were used to create a 3-min advocacy video. PHNs featured in this video discussed the implications of rerouting resources to combat COVID-19 for the populations they serve. The authors disseminated the video through popular social media venues, public health and nursing organizations and nurse influencers to reach nursing students, faculty, and the public. Over an 8-week period, the video received 2732 views on social media with an average view duration of 2 min. This article includes strategies to maximize the impact of an advocacy video when shared with relevant stakeholders.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Nurses, Public Health , COVID-19/prevention & control , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , Public Health Nursing/education , Workforce
3.
Online Journal of Issues in Nursing ; 26(2):1-11, 2021.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-1468545

ABSTRACT

Recent estimates of the economic cost for a family of four, who do not fall below the official poverty measure (U. S. Department of Health and Human Services TU.S. Disparities amongst racial and ethnic groups exist when those reporting 1 >. chronic diseases exceed the respective U.S. population. Additionally, certain pre-existing conditions in adults, such as cancer, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Down syndrome, cardiovascular disease, immunocompromised state (organ transplant), obesity, severe obesity, Sickle cell disease, smoking, and type 2 diabetes mellitus increase the risk for severe illness (requiring hospitalization) from COVID-19 fCDC. 2021af Multiple chronic diseases are associated with poor health outcomes (Sambamoorthi. [...]of Medicaid expansion (АСА), access to care has increased for low-income people and people of color.

4.
JAMA ; 326(3): 257-265, 2021 07 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1338165

ABSTRACT

Importance: Extenuating circumstances can trigger unplanned changes to randomized trials and introduce methodological, ethical, feasibility, and analytical challenges that can potentially compromise the validity of findings. Numerous randomized trials have required changes in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, but guidance for reporting such modifications is incomplete. Objective: As a joint extension for the CONSORT and SPIRIT reporting guidelines, CONSERVE (CONSORT and SPIRIT Extension for RCTs Revised in Extenuating Circumstances) aims to improve reporting of trial protocols and completed trials that undergo important modifications in response to extenuating circumstances. Evidence: A panel of 37 international trial investigators, patient representatives, methodologists and statisticians, ethicists, funders, regulators, and journal editors convened to develop the guideline. The panel developed CONSERVE following an accelerated, iterative process between June 2020 and February 2021 involving (1) a rapid literature review of multiple databases (OVID Medline, OVID EMBASE, and EBSCO CINAHL) and gray literature sources from 2003 to March 2021; (2) consensus-based panelist meetings using a modified Delphi process and surveys; and (3) a global survey of trial stakeholders. Findings: The rapid review yielded 41 673 citations, of which 38 titles were relevant, including emerging guidance from regulatory and funding agencies for managing the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on trials. However, no generalizable guidance for all circumstances in which trials and trial protocols might face unanticipated modifications were identified. The CONSERVE panel used these findings to develop a consensus reporting guidelines following 4 rounds of meetings and surveys. Responses were received from 198 professionals from 34 countries, of whom 90% (n = 178) indicated that they understood the concept definitions and 85.4% (n = 169) indicated that they understood and could use the implementation tool. Feedback from survey respondents was used to finalize the guideline and confirm that the guideline's core concepts were applicable and had utility for the trial community. CONSERVE incorporates an implementation tool and checklists tailored to trial reports and trial protocols for which extenuating circumstances have resulted in important modifications to the intended study procedures. The checklists include 4 sections capturing extenuating circumstances, important modifications, responsible parties, and interim data analyses. Conclusions and Relevance: CONSERVE offers an extension to CONSORT and SPIRIT that could improve the transparency, quality, and completeness of reporting important modifications to trials in extenuating circumstances such as COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Guidelines as Topic , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/standards , Research Report/standards , Clinical Protocols , Delphi Technique , Humans , Publishing/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL